During its meeting on 1 February 2017, the Swiss Federal Council initiated a consultation on amendments to the Banking Act and Banking Ordinance in the FinTech area. The aim is to ensure that barriers to market entry for FinTech firms in Switzerland are reduced and that the competitiveness of the Switzerland as a financial centre is enhanced. The consultation will last until 8 May 2017.
By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser
In a recent report on licensing applications the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) revealed that it has granted 7 Australian financial services licences (AFSL) and 3 Australian credit licences to marketplace lenders between January and June 2016. A further 3 AFSL applications are currently being considered. Previously, 6 licenses were granted between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015. This indicates that the number of entrants to the Australian market continues to grow.
Unlike other jurisdictions such as New Zealand, Australia does not have specific marketplace lending legislation. Marketplace lenders have had to adapt to fit within the existing financial services framework. There are a number of business models that can be used to facilitate marketplace lending.
By Tyler Kirk
In this installment of “The Future of Active Funds,” we explore how an active fund can get started with using blockchain technology. As we predicted in Part 2 of this series, 2017 is shaping up as the year blockchain applications will be brought to market, revolutionizing the way securities transactions are executed. As an initial matter, blockchain will reduce the time and cost of settling transactions. Given the cost advantages of passive funds and ETFs over active funds, there is less of an incentive for passives and ETFs to become early adopters of blockchain. However, blockchain is a solution for at least one major problem faced by active fund managers, the inability to compete on a cost basis.
So, what is an easy way for an active fund to get started with blockchain? According to a recent HBR article, a “single-use” implementation is best. Active funds can begin simply by accepting investments in bitcoin and redeeming investors in bitcoin. This will allow the fund’s adviser, board, and service providers to become comfortable with the technology. Further, as we previously posted, experimentation is easy thanks to blockchain cloud services offered by Microsoft, Amazon, and IBM. However, there are legal issues such as appropriate disclosures regarding transacting in bitcoin and custody under § 17(f) of the 1940 Act. For a good primer on the technology, read our article, Blockchain 101 for Asset Managers. Bottom-line, active managers need to have a blockchain strategy or risk being left behind.
As companies continue to look for practical uses for blockchain’s distributed ledger technology, we’re seeing interesting collaborations between major banks, global technology players, and nimble startup fintech companies. To be sure, banks are still focused on blockchain as it applies to financial services. BNY Mellon recently hosted a blockchain event at which presenters discussed whether blockchain should be viewed by banks as a disrupter or an opportunity. (Naturally the bank is looking for opportunity.) Of particular interest to the lawyers is the discussion of legal risks raised by blockchain, which include problems already in existence, such as data privacy concerns across geographic jurisdictions, and new problems created by blockchain, such as identifying where an asset is when no one bank or entity is the custodian of the record.
But the banks aren’t only experimenting with, dare we say, traditional financial uses for blockchain; they’re right in the mix trying to figure out how to exploit blockchain in industries far beyond the bitcoin world. BNY Mellon has also, for example, joined Cisco, Foxconn, security company Gemalto and several blockchain startups in a collaboration to develop a shared blockchain protocol for the Internet of Things. Blockchain could potentially improve security of IoT applications and create a tamperproof manufacturing, maintenance and supply chain history, areas not typically viewed as concerns of large financial institutions. Banks are experimenting with supply chain technology. Now that’s looking for opportunity in the world of disruption.
The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) issued a consultation paper “Crowdfunding: SME Financing Though Lending” on 31 January 2017. The paper proposes a regulatory framework for anyone looking to operate a loan-based crowdfunding platform in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). It is the first in a series of papers which will set out the DFSA’s approach to the regulation of FinTech more generally.
The key proposals include:
The rules are benchmarked against the regimes in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, France, Netherlands and Spain, being those jurisdictions that create an individual regime for these types of platforms.
The DFSA is seeking comments from anyone who is interested in operating, investing in, or providing services to crowdfunding platforms in the DIFC. This can be done via email consultation@dfsa.ae with “CP109″ in the subject line. Comments should be submitted by 2 March 2017.
Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.