Archive:2024

1
Federal Court Vacates SEC’s Expanded Dealer Definition
2
AI and Your Obligations as Licensee
3
First JPEX Judgement by a Hong Kong Court in Favor of Customers
4
Crypto.com’s Mission to Seek Regulatory Clarity for Digital Assets
5
Cryptocurrency Industry Can Shape California’s New Licensing Regime
6
Good News: California Amends and Delays Its Digital Financial Assets Law
7
Banking Regulators’ Growing Concerns over Bank-Fintech Partnerships
8
Vermont Enters a New Age of Virtual Currency Money Transmission
9
Warning: UK Makes Reimbursing Customers Tricked into Authorizing Payments Mandatory
10
Recent Supreme Court Decisions Could Significantly Impact the Payments Industry

Federal Court Vacates SEC’s Expanded Dealer Definition

By: Eden L. Rohrer, Richard F. Kerr, Jessica D. Cohn, and Joshua L. Durham

On 21 November 2024, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Court) ruled against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in two separate cases, vacating its rule which expanded the definition of securities dealers.

Read More

AI and Your Obligations as Licensee

By: Daniel Knight, Ben Kneebush and Madison Jeffreys

As Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to be adopted and used by Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensees broadly, there is a risk that the deployment of AI might cause licensees to fall short of their existing regulatory obligations and emerging best practices.

Read More

First JPEX Judgement by a Hong Kong Court in Favor of Customers

By: Jay Lee, Natalie Chow, and Alvin Lam

On 29 October 2024, the Hong Kong District Court issued the judgment of the first legal action (Chan Wing Yan and Another v. JP-EX Crypto Asset Platform Ltd and Others [2024] HKDC 1628) against JPEX, which the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission has identified as an unlicensed virtual asset trading platform (VATP).

Read More

Crypto.com’s Mission to Seek Regulatory Clarity for Digital Assets

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Judith Rinearson, Eden L. Rohrer, and Joshua L. Durham

On 8 October, Crypto.com made two novel, strategic moves to seek regulatory clarity regarding the classification of digital assets. First, the digital asset exchange sued the SEC, claiming that the SEC exceeded its statutory authority with respect to its classification of digital assets as securities without any notice-and-comment rulemaking as required under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Second, Crypto.com’s affiliate that is a CFTC-registered derivatives exchange petitioned the SEC and CFTC to provide a joint interpretation on how its swap products should be governed by the agencies.

Read More

Cryptocurrency Industry Can Shape California’s New Licensing Regime

By: Jeremy McLaughlin and Joshua Durham

On 2 October 2024, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), issued draft proposed rules to implement the state’s new cryptocurrency licensing regime, the Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL). DFPI is seeking comments on the proposed rules and set a deadline of 18 November 2024.

Read More

Good News: California Amends and Delays Its Digital Financial Assets Law

By: Jeremy M. McLaughlin and Joshua L. Durham

Good news for the cryptocurrency industry. On 29 September 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom approved Assembly Bill 1934, which extends the time within which digital assets companies must obtain a license to engage in digital financial asset business activity under the Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL). Entities now have until July 2026 to obtain licensure, which is a year later than originally planned.

Read More

Banking Regulators’ Growing Concerns over Bank-Fintech Partnerships

By: Jeremy M. McLaughlin, Grant F. Butler, Andrew C. Glass, Gregory N. Blase, and Joshua L. Durham

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have jointly issued a request for information (RFI) seeking input on the nature, risks, and implications of bank-fintech partnerships. Accompanying the RFI, the agencies issued a joint statement on banks’ arrangements with third parties to deliver bank deposit products and services (Joint Statement). We will be hosting a webinar on this topic on 10 September (register here), and comments to the RFI are due 30 September.

Read More

Vermont Enters a New Age of Virtual Currency Money Transmission

By: Jeremy McLaughlin and Joshua Durham

Effective July 2024, Vermont rehauled its money transmission law, joining the other states (approximately half) that have enacted some or all of the Money Transmission Modernization Act (MTMA). In doing so, Vermont furthers a trend of states expanding their regulators’ purview over the virtual currency industry.

Read More

Warning: UK Makes Reimbursing Customers Tricked into Authorizing Payments Mandatory

By: Kai Zhang and Judie Rinearson

Authorized push payment frauds (APP fraud) happen where one is tricked into sending money to a fraudster posing as a genuine payee. Currently some protection is provided to UK victims via a voluntary industry code. However, this has been considered insufficient. So now a new mandatory reimbursement regime is coming, from 7 October 2024.

Read More

Recent Supreme Court Decisions Could Significantly Impact the Payments Industry

By: Jeremy McLaughlin, Greg Blase, Andrew Glass, and Josh Durham

The Supreme Court issued two decisions at the end of its term that will significantly alter how federal courts review challenges to federal regulations. The decisions could have a significant impact on the highly regulated payments industry.

Read More

Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.