FinTech Industry & Regulation – Page 29 – FinTech and Blockchain Law Watch

Retailer invests in FinTech

Jan 05 2017

UK department store company House of Fraser is to invest £35m in Tandem, an app-only challenger bank. The move will enable House of Fraser to offer online banking services to shoppers.

Tandem was founded in 2014 and received its UK banking licence a year ago. It has already raised over $30m from investors, including eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar. Founded in 2014, Tandem raised £1m last year in a crowdfunding campaign, valuing it at £65m.

Tandem competes with other new app-only start-up banks, dubbed “neobanks”, including Monzo, Starling and Atom. It currently offers a savings tool that lets people monitor spending on any bank account. It began rolling out its app in November 2016 and plans to launch credit and debit products in 2017.

House of Fraser was acquired by Chinese conglomerate Sanpower in a £480m deal in 2014. While the company already offers credit and loyalty cards through NewDay, the ability to offer app-only online banking services is a departure that could see other UK retail multiples follow suit.

UK FCA to publish consultation paper on new rules for investment and loan-based crowdfunding platforms

Jan 05 2017

By Tom R. Wallace

In December 2016 the UK FCA published a statement of its intention to publish a Consultation Paper in Q1 2017 proposing new rules for investment and loan-based crowdfunding platforms.

Based on information the FCA has gathered through a consultation ending in September 2016 and its supervision and authorisation of crowdfunding platforms, the FCA’s view is that aspects of the crowdfunding market currently pose some risks to its objectives. The FCA perceives risk of regulatory arbitrage in the loan-based sector, and potential for investors to misunderstand the nature of the products offered. While respondents to the FCA’s request for feedback rightly note that many of these risks existed when the FCA established the current crowdfunding regulatory framework in 2014, the FCA counters that the market has grown in significance and complexity since then.

While investment-based crowdfunding is facilitated entirely by fully-authorised firms, most loan-based crowdfunding firms, including the largest ones, have so far operated under interim permissions. The FCA notes that, while it has identified some issues about the investment-based crowdfunding market, most of its attention at this time is on issues in relation to loan-based crowdfunding.

Taken together with its other statements on the crowdfunding sector, the FCA is giving an indication of its perspective on the issues associated with the #crowdfunding market and, pending publication of consultations on the new rules, incumbents and innovators should take care to create legal, operational and compliance structures that are likely to align with the FCA’s direction of travel in this market.

The FCA frame this as an evolution of the existing regulatory framework, not a revolution, and I find the FCA’s depth of the knowledge about, objectives for and focus on the market to be a source of optimism for the future of the crowdfunding market in the UK for investors, incumbents and innovators.

SEC FinTech Forum Part 2: Don’t Call Me a Robo Adviser

Dec 21 2016

By Brian Vargo and Tyler Kirk

As we reported in Part 1 of this series of posts, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission held its first forum exclusively focused on the impact of the FinTech movement on November 14, 2016. The first panel of the forum addressed recent innovations in investment advisory services. The panel was comprised of Ben Alden, General Counsel of Betterment, Bo Lu, Co-Founder and CEO of Future Advisor at Blackrock, Mark Goines, Vice Chairman of Personal Capital, and Jim Allen, Head of Capital Markets Policy Group, CFA Institute. While several of the panelists lamented the use of the title “Robo Adviser,” the panel’s discussion was vibrant and delved deeply into the role robo advisers (advisers which rely to varying degrees on computer-based technology, primarily algorithms, to deliver investment advice) are and should be playing in the United States.

First, the panel discussed the growth in automated advice, attributing the growth to the ability of lower net worth investors, especially those comfortable with technology, to obtain affordable and sophisticated investment advice. Given the savings shortfall in the United States, this growth was viewed to be a positive trend. Further, the panel also noted that the DOL Fiduciary Rule is also driving growth. Ultimately, the panelists thought that the industry would consolidate as assets under management grew.

ASIC provides update on the Innovation Hub

Dec 16 2016

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

In a recent speech, Australian Securities and Investments Commission Chairman Greg Medcraft released information on FinTech businesses which have taken advantage of the Innovation Hub established by ASIC in April earlier this year. Robo-advisers and marketplace lenders were the most prevalent types of businesses to approach the Innovation Hub. The 109 different businesses that the Innovation Hub engaged with this year included:

25 robo-advisers
22 marketplace lenders
17 payments businesses
11 credit providers
9 crowdsourced equity providers

ASIC has also noted that those who received assistance from the Innovation Hub before applying for an Australian financial services licence were approved on average 95 days or 45% faster than those who hadn’t.

UK and Hong Kong sign cooperation agreement

Dec 14 2016

By Jonathan Lawrence

FinTech companies and other innovative financial businesses will be given help to establish overseas operations in the UK and Hong Kong by regulators in those countries under a new cooperation agreement signed in London on 9 December 2016. Under the agreement, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) will “refer to each other innovator businesses that would like to operate in the other authority’s jurisdiction”.

Upon a referral being received, the FCA or HKMA both intend to “assist the innovator businesses in understanding the regulatory regime” that they oversee and explain “how such regimes may be relevant” to those companies. The agreement also confirms that the FCA and HKMA intend to “share information about innovations in financial services in their respective markets”, such as on emerging trends and regulatory issues pertaining to innovation. The FCA and HKMA may also pursue “joint innovation projects on the application of novel financial technologies”, share expertise and knowledge, and facilitate staff secondments to one another, under the new cooperation agreement.

Will there be an Asia Pacific ‘FinTech Passport’ in the future?

Dec 14 2016

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Chairman, Greg Medcraft, has discussed cooperation between FinTech regulators at the recent International Institute of Finance Chief Risk Officer Forum in Singapore.

The Chairman noted “because the internet knows no boundaries” cooperation and collaboration between regulators is critical and developing responses to FinTech should not be done in isolation. The Chairman then highlighted the following steps required for cooperation.

1. Sharing information

Regulators in Australia, UK, Singapore, Canada, Kenya, South Korea, Switzerland and India have entered into various cooperation agreements with other regulators to share information about FinTech developments and emerging trends in their markets. Many of the cooperation agreements also allow FinTech businesses to access Innovation Hubs in other jurisdictions. The Chairman noted that ASIC was also informally in regular contact with regulators in the US and Europe.

2. Harmonisation

While ideally regulators would work towards harmonising their regulatory responses and approaches, it was acknowledged that this will be a challenge due to competition between countries to attract FinTech businesses. The Chairman raised the possibility of introducing a “fintech passport” which could ease entry into other jurisdictions for businesses. Another possible solution raised was to develop “equivalence processes” around regulation.

OCC Explores Special Purpose National Bank Charter for FinTech Companies

Dec 07 2016

By Judith E. Rinearson, Anthony R.G. Nolan, Rebecca Laird, and Jeremy M. McLaughlin

On December 2, 2016, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) announced its plans to move forward with a proposal to consider applications from financial technology (“FinTech”) companies to receive charters as special purpose national banks. The OCC simultaneously released a white paper detailing the program. The OCC is seeking comments on its proposal, including responses to 13 specific questions listed in the paper. The announcement is potentially significant for the FinTech sector, but questions remain as to whether a special bank charter would represent a fundamental change or merely an incremental enhancement. The comment period ends on January 15, 2017. See our Legal Insight on the proposal here.

UK Department for International Trade announces FinTech mission to Australia

Dec 07 2016

By Jonathan Lawrence

The UK’s Department for International Trade (DIT) has announced its first FinTech mission to Australia taking place in Sydney and Melbourne from 20-23 March 2017.

DIT will select 8-12 UK FinTech companies to participate in the mission to Australia where they will participate in a programme of events and activities. Delegates will spend two days in Sydney, two days in Melbourne and an optional fifth day in Australia or New Zealand. The delegates will meet with and pitch to Australian financial institutions and venture capital firms, visit FinTech hubs, meet the regulator and government ministers, network with the Australian FinTech community, hear from UK FinTech companies that have found success in Australia and schedule meetings with potential customers and partners.

British Consul General in Sydney and Director-General UK Trade & Investment for Australia and New Zealand, Nick McInnes said: “We are very pleased to have the opportunity to bring a group of UK FinTech companies to Australia for the first time and introduce them to the local market. While FinTech in Australia is still in relatively early stages, the industry is growing rapidly and there are many opportunities for UK companies to set up, collaborate and succeed. The FinTech market in Australia is forecast to grow to over AU $4 billion by 2020, of which AU $1 billion will be completely new added value to the Australian economy, so now is an ideal time for UK companies to enter the market”.

For more details, please click here.

The post-election fintech world: are happy days (for bankers) here again?

Dec 05 2016

By Judith Rinearson and Eric Love

In the days following the U.S. federal elections that resulted in the election of Donald Trump as President and Republican control of the 115th Congress, FinTech companies, banks, and other financial institutions are increasingly asking whether they still need to worry about compliance with the landmark Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) regulatory actions, and other financial services regulations.

It is true that there will likely be some significant regulatory changes, but it is a little too early for industry participants to pop the champagne corks.

To see are our thoughts about some of the top issues impacting FinTech companies, banks and other financial institutions, click here.

UK Supreme Court to stream live today on future of Brexit

Dec 05 2016

By Judith Rinearson

The Fintech world is strongly impacted by Brexit, with the ability to access financial markets easily an important factor for disruptors. No doubt they, like many of us, have a keen eye on the speed in which Brexit can occur.

On 3 November 2016, the High Court in the UK ruled that the Prime Minister cannot trigger Article 50 (the notification that triggers the process of the UK leaving the EU) without the leave of Parliament. The decision was appealed, and the Supreme Court (the highest appellate court in the UK) will hear the matter starting today, 5 December. The four days of hearings will be streamed live from the Supreme Court’s website (click here).

There will be eleven justices hearing the matter, which (according to the UK’s non-profit Full Fact organization) will be the largest panel of judges to have heard a single appeal—since the Supreme Court’s predecessor was established in 1876. There are some interesting potential outcomes of this process, including the possibility that the matter will need to be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union to interpret Article 50.

Please note that even if the Supreme Court sides with the High Court, and decides that the Article 50 notification requires an Act of Parliament, it will still be for Parliament to decide whether or not they want to confirm and continue with the referendum’s Brexit result, or attempt to impose terms on the triggering of Article 50 (which some say is not possible), or reject it altogether. These are interesting times in the UK. We will be watching these developments closely.

Category:FinTech Industry & Regulation