FinTech and Blockchain Law Watch

At the Crossroads of Law, Innovation and Commerce

1
Mastercard assists Open Banking
2
Dubai Fintech Goes Global
3
Understanding the Effect of Wyoming’s Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Legislation
4
OCC Expected to Release Guidance on FinTech Charter in July 2018
5
Augmented Reality: Coming to a Store Near You?
6
Commissioner Peirce Remarks on the Challenges of Cryptocurrency Regulation
7
Federal Government to implement Open Banking regime in Australia
8
U.S. Government Accountability Office Issues Recommendations on FinTech Regulation
9
A Regulatory Sandbox for FinTech Innovation Emerges on the U.S. Playground: What It Means for Money Transmitters
10
US Court signals that proving data breach class actions will be difficult

Mastercard assists Open Banking

By Jonathan Lawrence

On 13 January 2018 the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) became law across the European Union, leading to Open Banking.  For background information, please see EU oversight on payments and Open Banking.

Mastercard announced on 5 June that it is launching a suite of services to help banks and FinTech companies navigate the Open Banking environment.  The programme seeks to address the liability issues of banks sharing their data with third parties and to help startups to better communicate with their banking partners.  For banks, Mastercard is building a pan-European directory of verified and legitimate third party providers, backed by a fraud monitoring service and dispute resolution mechanism.  Startups in turn will be provided with a ‘connectivity hub’ that will help third parties establish and maintain communication with banks.

The new services will be launched first during a pilot phase in early 2019, with the UK and Poland being a particular priority, before being rolled out across Europe later that year.

Dubai Fintech Goes Global

By Jonathan Lawrence

Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) has signed a FinTech Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with professional services company Accenture. Under the MoU, FinTech Hive at DIFC – the first financial technology accelerator in the Middle East region – will collaborate with Accenture’s FinTech Innovation Labs in New York, London and Hong Kong, to share resources and knowledge on research and trends in FinTech. In line with the DIFC Growth Strategy 2024 and Dubai Vision 2021, FinTech Hive gives financial companies access to technologies to support their digital transformation while providing innovators with access to potential clients and investors.

Read More

Understanding the Effect of Wyoming’s Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Legislation

By Carl E. VolzEden L. RohrerJudith E. RinearsonJeremy M. McLaughlin and Daniel S. Cohen

March was a busy month in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space for the Wyoming state government.  The legislature passed, and the governor signed, five bills that many in the industry view as favorable to blockchain and cryptocurrency businesses.  While the bills provide some beneficial clarity in this space and may attract businesses to the state, the scope and effect of some of the bills is limited.  Accordingly, it is important that industry participants fully understand what the new Wyoming laws address, and, perhaps more importantly, what they do not.

Please see our latest thinking here for a full discussion of Wyoming’s new blockchain and cryptocurrency legislation.

OCC Expected to Release Guidance on FinTech Charter in July 2018

By Eric A. Love and Dan Cohen

On May 24, 2018, Comptroller of the Currency Joseph Otting indicated during a press call that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) will release guidance in July 2018 on whether it will move forward with issuing a special purpose charter to FinTech companies.  According to press reports, Comptroller Otting had previously indicated that the OCC hasn’t yet made a final decision about issuance of a FinTech charter, although he had also signaled that guidance from the OCC on the matter could be released as early as June.  His more recent comments during the press call extend this timetable by a month.

Read More

Augmented Reality: Coming to a Store Near You?

By Cameron Abbott, Warwick Anderson and Georgia Mills

Recent moves from PayPal and Target have brought fresh attention to the use of augmented reality (AR) in commercial settings. The technology remains in its infant stage but the revival of PayPal’s patent for payment-enabled AR glasses has some analysts wondering how close the technology is to becoming the mainstream.

The software described in the patent would give consumers with the glasses access to product and purchasing data simply by looking at an item on a store shelf.

Read More

Commissioner Peirce Remarks on the Challenges of Cryptocurrency Regulation

By Andrew Massey, C. Todd Gibson Philip J. Morgan and Evan J. Glover

On May 2, 2018, Commissioner Hester Peirce shared her views regarding how cryptocurrencies fit within the regulatory landscape of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Click here for the full remarks.

Commissioner Peirce, recognizing that not all tokens are alike, acknowledged that the appropriate regulatory scheme for cryptocurrencies will be the product of a function over form analysis. Additionally, Peirce noted that the functionality of a token changes over time, requiring a more nuanced regulatory scheme to ensure market safety.

Read More

Federal Government to implement Open Banking regime in Australia

Jim Bulling, Daniel Knight and Felix Charlesworth

On 9 May 2018, the Australian Government confirmed their decision to establish an Australian Open Banking regime and implement the recommendations set out in the Farrell Report titled “Review into Open Banking in Australia”. This follows the Government’s report into Open Banking released in February 2018 which broadly supported the creation of a new data-sharing regime in the financial services industry. The Australian Government has set aside roughly $45 million over four years to develop the creation of a Consumer Data Right which includes the establishment of the Open Banking framework.

Read More

U.S. Government Accountability Office Issues Recommendations on FinTech Regulation

By  Judith Rinearson and Eric A. Love

The U.S. GAO issued its anticipated 132-page report entitled “Financial Technology: Additional Steps by Regulators Could Better Protect Consumers and Aid Regulatory Oversight.”  In the report, the GAO describes the benefits and risks; regulatory oversight and challenges; and regulatory efforts to foster innovation with respect to the following four specified FinTech activities: person to person payments, marketplace lending, digital wealth management and distributed ledger technology.  It also offers recommendations about how to enhance FinTech regulation.

Read More

A Regulatory Sandbox for FinTech Innovation Emerges on the U.S. Playground: What It Means for Money Transmitters

By Eric A. Love and Judith Rinearson

 Many FinTechs have benefited from government-established regulatory sandboxes in diverse jurisdictions such as Australia, the UK and Singapore.  However, the U.S. has been noticeably slow to adapt these innovation-friendly programs.  That is now changing.

Arizona recently enacted a new law (H.B. 2434) to create a Regulatory Sandbox Program (the “Program”) that will allow FinTech companies to temporarily test innovative financial products and services without being subject to money transmitter and similar licensing requirements in that state.  The Program will be administered by the Arizona Attorney General (the “AG”) and is the first of its kind among U.S. states.

Read More

US Court signals that proving data breach class actions will be difficult

By Andrew C. Glass, David D. Christensen, Cameron Abbott and Matthew N. Lowe

In the US, several attempts at class actions for those affected by a data breach have failed challenges in early procedural stages.  In Dieffenbach v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 887 F.3d 826 (7th Cir. Apr. 11, 2018), the Seventh Circuit allowed a data breach class action to survive the pleadings stage.  At the same time, the Court indicated that the plaintiffs may have a tough time proving their claims on the merits or establishing that class certification is warranted.  At the end of the day, the Dieffenbach decision may prove to be less of a boon and more of a bust for plaintiffs in data breach class actions.  Although it may provide a means to get into court, the decision makes clear that obtaining a favorable outcome may be a “difficult task.”  For a full summary of the Dieffenbach decision please see our client alert here.

Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.