EU Fintech developments
By Jacob Ghanty
In the linked article, Jacob Ghanty discusses some UK and EU regulatory developments affecting the FinTech sector. This article was first published on Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence on 1 April 2016.
By Jacob Ghanty
In the linked article, Jacob Ghanty discusses some UK and EU regulatory developments affecting the FinTech sector. This article was first published on Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence on 1 April 2016.
By Jacob Ghanty
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority published its final report on the Financial Advice Market Review on 14 March, which stated that there is a “clear need for intervention by the regulator and the government” to aid the provision of new and more cost-effective ways of delivering financial advice and guidance. The FAMR sets out recommendations to address concerns relating to the affordability and accessibility of financial advice, which includes recommendations to help firms develop automated “robo-advice” models. In the linked article, first published in E-Finance & Payments Law & Policy, Jacob Ghanty expresses his views on robo-advice developments.
By Michelle Chasser and Daniel Knight
In a recent speech at the Innovate Finance Global Summit, Christopher Woolard of the UK Financial Conduct Agency (FCA) provided details about the UK regulatory sandbox due to launch 9 May 2016. The sandbox will allow two FinTech cohorts a year to test their ideas without incurring the significant regulatory set up costs usually associated with going to market.
Participants in the sandbox will be given restricted authorisations to provide financial services to allow them to market test their ideas. The FCA will also develop a streamlined application process. Full authorisation will need to be sought to operate outside the sandbox.
Will English courts recognise cryptocurrency in tort and restitution claims? An article by Peter Susman QC in the March 2016 issue of the Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law considers that English common law is robust enough to facilitate the development of legal remedies for lost cryptocurrency (“Virtual money in the virtual bank: legal remedies for loss” (2016) 3 JIBFL 152).
A more complex issue is whether English law is ready to provide effective remedies in tort or restitution for misappropriated cryptocurrency. English courts have previously had difficulty applying criminal law to intangible assets. The Fraud Act 2006 helped remove any confusion by focusing on what has been done, rather than the type of property which has been affected.
So it should not be difficult to argue that the law of contract developed under English common law will apply on the same basis to cryptocurrencies. Principles developed under contract law may be used to answer questions about whether contractual obligations have been incurred, on what terms and what remedies may be available in relation to cryptocurrency.
In any event, many transactional and litigation lawyers tend to think of money less as personal property, and more as obligations owed by and to persons in respect of that money. The focus of courts should be then on remedies rather than proprietary rights.
The emergence of blockchain technology and the size of the FinTech industry were the major points of discussion at a recently concluded CBI Insights and KPMG webinar on the future of FinTech.
Blockchain is a data structure that creates a digital ledger of transactions. Using cryptography, blockchain allows participants to securely manipulate the ledger without any central authority. Once the information is entered, it is almost impossible to erase – creating an accurate record of the transaction’s history.
The technology is still in its infancy and currently undergoing significant experimentation. For established financial institutions such as banks, blockchain is seen as a possible solution to the problem of an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. The technology is also seen as an effective tool in combatting money laundering as it tracks a transaction’s entire digital history.
Venture capital investment in blockchain, which had seen a rapid rise over the last several years, is showing signs of plateauing as the technology matures. However, the boom in FinTech investment is expected to continue unabated as companies emerge from their infancy and the adoption of their technology becomes more widespread. In 2015, investments into FinTech were US$14 billion, with major banks such as J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs as primary investors. In the UK, Funding Circle, Atom Bank and World Remit each received in excess of US$100 million in funding in 2015. There are now 19 FinTech companies with a market capitalisation in excess of US$1 billion.
By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have signed a co-operation agreement to promote fintech innovation. The agreement will make expansion into Australian and UK markets easier for growing fintech businesses.
Both ASIC and FCA have already established innovation hubs to assist fintech businesses with their regulatory obligations and encourage development of the industry. A referral mechanism has been created under the new agreement which allows ASIC to refer Australian fintech businesses wanting to enter the UK market to FCA and vice versa. Referred businesses will then receive the same support from the other country’s innovation hub as local businesses.
ASIC and FCA also undertake to share information about emerging market trends and developments, regulatory issues pertaining to innovation in financial services and referred businesses. Shared information will be valuable for developing fintech regulations.
By Sonia Gioseffi, Shehram Khattak, Jonathan Lawrence and Ronnie Yearwood
Without doubt, FinTech companies are in some ways deconstructing the services offered by larger banks in the UK and elsewhere. However, risks are not resolved because of the technology, as information and financial products are marketed and sold via web-based platforms, social media or other technological applications. Consumers still need to be clearly informed about the firms and the financial products being offered. Firms must still ensure that they adhere to the principle that their communications are “fair, clear and not misleading”. It is, therefore, better for a FinTech firm to apply and take advice on best practice in this regard, which saves money and time in the interim, than to wait either for enforcement from the regulator or for market failure to drive responses. Find our longer article here.
If you’re interested in the industry view from London, how about listening and subscribing to London FinTech Podcast? It provides access to many of the leaders in the London FinTech space and provides podcasts discussing topics including start up and emerging growth, marketplace lending, crowdfunding, alternative currencies, payment systems, equity funding, invoice finance, investment and the existing financial services response to FinTech innovations.
By Cameron Abbott and May Giuliani
Investment in fintech systems is becoming increasingly popular globally, but no more so than it is in the UK. Deal volumes in the UK have been growing at 74% per year since 2008 (compared with 27% globally). This digital disruption marks the most major period of change for financial services companies in decades.
According to recent data, the UK alone accounted for $901 million of the $12.5 billion invested in fintech worldwide last year. Five other European nations combined for $1.1 billion. This huge investment in the UK included two of the top 20 fintech deals in the world – Challenger Bank Atom raised $125 million, and peer-to-peer lending platform Funding Circle raised $150 million. Over 60% of fintech venture capital investment investments in 2015 were made into alternative finance and payment services such as Funding Circle, Currency Cloud and Transferwise.
See here for The 2015 Fintech Investment Landscape, February 2016.
By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser
Rival technology powerhouses Apple, Google, Amazon, Intuit and PayPal have joined forces to form an advocacy group known as Financial Innovation Now, focused on enabling technological change within the finance industry. The group will work with policy-makers and key stakeholders to promote policies and regulations that encourage greater innovation in the financial services sector as well as ensuring that policy-makers understand the advantages that technology can bring to the industry.
Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.