US – Page 9 – FinTech and Blockchain Law Watch

Jury Finds Two Guilty in Bitcoin Exchange Bribery Scheme; Related Criminal Prosecutions Looming

Mar 23 2017

By Nicole C. Mueller and Clifford C. Histed

On March 17, 2017, a Manhattan federal jury convicted Trevon Gross, a pastor, and Yuri Lebedev, a software engineer, of bribery and of conspiring to operate bitcoin exchange Coin.mx as an unlawful money transmitting business. The jury also convicted Lebedev of fraud. Sentencing is scheduled for July 2017.

Lebedev and Coin.mx operator Anthony Murgio were charged in 2015. Coin.mx allegedly operated as a conduit for cybercrime-related funds, and in violation of state and federal money transmitting laws. Prosecutors argued to the jury that Murgio and Lebedev sought to trick the financial institutions through which Coin.mx processed transactions into believing its unlawful bitcoin exchange business was simply a members-only “collectibles club.” Part of the Coin.mx scheme included processing and profiting from bitcoin transactions conducted on behalf of victims of ransomware attacks by allowing the victims to buy bitcoins to pay ransom payments while generating revenue for Coin.mx. Murgio pleaded guilty before trial.

CFTC FinTech Initiative

Mar 21 2017

By Anthony Nolan

On Wednesday Commissioner (and Chairman-designate) Giancarlo of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gave a speech to the Futures Industry Association in which he identified the embrace of technological change as a key factor in economic growth. In that speech he announced that the CFTC has been conducting a review of FinTech innovation issues including those arising from a range of new digital technologies. The review is focused on three issues:

How the CFTC should leverage FinTech innovation to make it a more effective regulator;
How CFTC rules and regulations need to be updated to account for FinTech in order for the Commission to be relevant in 21st Century digital markets; and
The proper role of the CFTC in promoting US FinTech innovation in CFTC regulated markets.

Lendit Conference 2017

Mar 20 2017

By Ed Dartley and Anthony Nolan

K&L Gates sponsored and attended Lendit again this year. For this year’s conference, we added a Monday afternoon cocktail hour to our exhibitor’s booth, and were able to meet a number of old and new friends in the process. In attendance were K&L attorneys Ed Dartley, Tony Nolan, Sasha Burstein, Linda Odom, John ReVeal, and Joe Valenti. Tony participated in a panel discussion entitled “True Lender and Madden Case: Impact on Industry-2 Years In.” The panel addressed several recent court cases and legislative developments that affect the availability of federal preemption to marketplace loans originated or purchased by non-bank lenders.

We found this year’s conference to be something of a coming of age for the marketplace lending industry. There was a sense that the industry is maturing, and that was reflected in the panel discussions and the networking of attendees. We found the conference to be as valuable for the re-connecting with existing associates and business colleagues as for the introductions to new ones.

As we continue to work with clients in virtually every aspect of marketplace lending, we find Lendit and other conferences to be a unique opportunity to interface with industry participants on cutting-edge developments, catch up with clients, and generally stay abreast of this fast-moving industry. Finally, please join us for Altfi Europe Summit 2017 in London on March 30, where we will be sponsoring and speaking at that marketplace lending event.

OCC Releases Draft Licensing Manual for Evaluating Fintech Bank Charter Applications

Mar 20 2017

By Anthony Nolan

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency today issued its draft licensing manual in furtherance of its proposal to grant national bank license to fintech companies. This provides additional detail on evaluating charter applications from fintech companies that engage in the business of banking. This is an interesting riposte to the Republican letter asking the OCC to delay the fintech charter process. A link to the OCC’s press release appears here.

CFPB Delays Prepaid Account Rule Effective Date

Mar 13 2017

By Eric A. Love and John ReVeal

On March 9th, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a proposed rule to delay for six months the October 1, 2017 effective date of its sweeping Final Rule amending Regulation E and Regulation Z as applied to prepaid accounts. Under the proposed rule, the Final Rule would become effective on April 1, 2018.

The proposed rule would not revise any other aspect of the Final Rule, and comes as numerous prepaid account industry participants have expressed concerns about its scope and their ability to comply with key provisions by the current October 1 effective date. Additionally, the proposed delay follows the recent introduction of legislation in Congress that would use the Congressional Review Act to repeal the Final Rule. According to the CFPB, the proposed delay would “be sufficient for industry participants to ensure they can comply” with the Final Rule and would provide the CFPB the opportunity to receive public comments about any implementation challenges that might impact consumers, the prepaid account industry and other stakeholders.

After publication in the Federal Register, the public will have 21 days to comment on the proposed rule.

SEC guidance on roboadvice

Mar 02 2017

By C. Todd Gibson and Michael W. McGrath

The US Securities and Exchange Commission’s staff has published information and guidance for investors and the financial services industry on the fast-growing use of “robo-advisers,” a catch-all term for investment advisers that use computer algorithms to provide investment advisory services online, often with limited human interaction. In light of the unique issues raised by robo-advisers, the SEC’s Division of Investment Management issued a Guidance Update on 23 February 2017 for investment advisers with suggestions on how robo-advisers can best comply with disclosure, suitability and compliance obligations imposed by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. A second publication, an Investor Bulletin issued by the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, provides individual investors with information they may need to make informed decisions if they consider using robo-advisers.

The Future of Active Funds Part 3: How to Get Started with Blockchain

Feb 06 2017

By Tyler Kirk

In this installment of “The Future of Active Funds,” we explore how an active fund can get started with using blockchain technology. As we predicted in Part 2 of this series, 2017 is shaping up as the year blockchain applications will be brought to market, revolutionizing the way securities transactions are executed. As an initial matter, blockchain will reduce the time and cost of settling transactions. Given the cost advantages of passive funds and ETFs over active funds, there is less of an incentive for passives and ETFs to become early adopters of blockchain. However, blockchain is a solution for at least one major problem faced by active fund managers, the inability to compete on a cost basis.

So, what is an easy way for an active fund to get started with blockchain? According to a recent HBR article, a “single-use” implementation is best. Active funds can begin simply by accepting investments in bitcoin and redeeming investors in bitcoin. This will allow the fund’s adviser, board, and service providers to become comfortable with the technology. Further, as we previously posted, experimentation is easy thanks to blockchain cloud services offered by Microsoft, Amazon, and IBM. However, there are legal issues such as appropriate disclosures regarding transacting in bitcoin and custody under § 17(f) of the 1940 Act. For a good primer on the technology, read our article, Blockchain 101 for Asset Managers. Bottom-line, active managers need to have a blockchain strategy or risk being left behind.

Banks Help Blockchain Move from Bitcoin to IoT

Feb 02 2017

By Susan P. Altman

As companies continue to look for practical uses for blockchain’s distributed ledger technology, we’re seeing interesting collaborations between major banks, global technology players, and nimble startup fintech companies. To be sure, banks are still focused on blockchain as it applies to financial services. BNY Mellon recently hosted a blockchain event at which presenters discussed whether blockchain should be viewed by banks as a disrupter or an opportunity. (Naturally the bank is looking for opportunity.) Of particular interest to the lawyers is the discussion of legal risks raised by blockchain, which include problems already in existence, such as data privacy concerns across geographic jurisdictions, and new problems created by blockchain, such as identifying where an asset is when no one bank or entity is the custodian of the record.

But the banks aren’t only experimenting with, dare we say, traditional financial uses for blockchain; they’re right in the mix trying to figure out how to exploit blockchain in industries far beyond the bitcoin world. BNY Mellon has also, for example, joined Cisco, Foxconn, security company Gemalto and several blockchain startups in a collaboration to develop a shared blockchain protocol for the Internet of Things. Blockchain could potentially improve security of IoT applications and create a tamperproof manufacturing, maintenance and supply chain history, areas not typically viewed as concerns of large financial institutions. Banks are experimenting with supply chain technology. Now that’s looking for opportunity in the world of disruption.

New Special Purpose National Bank Charter for FinTech Companies

Jan 31 2017

New York partners Anthony Nolan and Judith Rinearson will be speaking in a Strafford live webinar on “New Special Purpose National Bank Charter for FinTech Companies: Evaluating the Benefits and Regulatory Pitfalls on Thursday, March 16 2017 at 1:00pm-2:30pm EDT. This will focus on a recent proposal by the United States Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to consider granting special purpose national bank charters to FinTech companies that are engaged in fiduciary activities or in activities that include receiving deposits, paying checks, or lending money. The special purpose charter offers the benefits of federal preemption and some state licensing requirements. However, there are regulatory and supervisory burdens that must be carefully considered such as activity limitations, BSA/AML requirements and minimum capital and liquidity requirements.

Top Five Legal Trends for FinTech in 2017

Jan 25 2017

Judith Rinearson and Robert Zinn contributed an article to AmericanLawyer.com on legal trends to watch for in 2017 concerning FinTech. Trends include:

Major political change
Investments and M&A
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF)
Blockchain & distributed ledgers
Cybercrime and data security

To read the article, click here.

Tag:US